# DenQAI: acquisition master request

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Which acquisition records have been requested, received, reconciled, and reviewed?

**Who:** Buyer’s diligence coordinator and independent workstream reviewers

**Records:** Seller request list; system-of-record exports; periods and formats; privacy rules; received files; control reconciliations.

## Complete the file

1. Use workstream and request_id to request the specified record for the stated minimum_period and format.
2. Track request_status, received_date, source_owner, and review_owner separately.
3. Complete control_reconciliation, material_gap, follow_up, and deadline before treating receipt as diligence closure.

## Definitions

- **System of record:** Authoritative source system for the requested item.
- **Control reconciliation:** Check tying the received detail to an independent or governing total.
- **Material gap:** Missing evidence that can meaningfully affect the decision.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: F-001 requests 60 months of provider-level aggregates; receipt of only a one-year summary remains a material gap pending follow-up.

## Review and next action

Pursue the missing record that most affects transfer, price, funding, or patient continuity.

The request tracker does not verify records or authorize unrestricted disclosure. Required periods are template requests, not proof that records exist.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/acquisition)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s acquisition master request. My question is: Which acquisition records have been requested, received, reconciled, and reviewed? Explain these terms in plain language: System of record, Control reconciliation, Material gap. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Seller request list; system-of-record exports; periods and formats; privacy rules; received files; control reconciliations. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The request tracker does not verify records or authorize unrestricted disclosure. Required periods are template requests, not proof that records exist. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Pursue the missing record that most affects transfer, price, funding, or patient continuity.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s acquisition master request against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Use workstream and request_id to request the specified record for the stated minimum_period and format. Track request_status, received_date, source_owner, and review_owner separately. Complete control_reconciliation, material_gap, follow_up, and deadline before treating receipt as diligence closure. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The request tracker does not verify records or authorize unrestricted disclosure. Required periods are template requests, not proof that records exist. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.