# DenQAI: associate capacity readiness

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Is planned associate work supported by verified demand, people, rooms, and permissions?

**Who:** Owner, operations lead, and associate-transition reviewers

**Records:** Aggregate patient demand; assistant and room capacity; onboarding, payer, supervision, and support evidence.

## Complete the file

1. For each capacity_or_dependency, enter planned_value and verified_supported_value in the stated unit.
2. Link controlling_record and reviewer_role rather than treating the plan as proof.
3. Assign owner, due_window, break_condition, and status for every unsupported dependency.

## Definitions

- **Planned value:** Capacity or condition the scenario intends to achieve.
- **Verified supported value:** Capacity or condition supported by the reviewed record.
- **Dependency:** Prerequisite that must be met for the planned work to occur.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: ASC-01 plans 24 patient-work hours weekly, but reviewed current demand supports 14; investigate the gap before committing to 24 productive hours.

## Review and next action

Resolve the binding dependency before relying on the proposed associate schedule.

The raw readiness sheet is not a hiring recommendation, employment agreement, credentialing approval, or schedule optimizer.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/growth)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s associate capacity readiness. My question is: Is planned associate work supported by verified demand, people, rooms, and permissions? Explain these terms in plain language: Planned value, Verified supported value, Dependency. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Aggregate patient demand; assistant and room capacity; onboarding, payer, supervision, and support evidence. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The raw readiness sheet is not a hiring recommendation, employment agreement, credentialing approval, or schedule optimizer. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Resolve the binding dependency before relying on the proposed associate schedule.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s associate capacity readiness against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: For each capacity_or_dependency, enter planned_value and verified_supported_value in the stated unit. Link controlling_record and reviewer_role rather than treating the plan as proof. Assign owner, due_window, break_condition, and status for every unsupported dependency. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The raw readiness sheet is not a hiring recommendation, employment agreement, credentialing approval, or schedule optimizer. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.