# DenQAI: broker adviser disclosure

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Who is each adviser’s client, how are they paid, and where can your information go?

**Who:** Buyer or seller before engaging advisers

**Records:** Engagements; agency disclosures; fee/referral terms; affiliate information; data-use and retention terms.

## Complete the file

1. Create one record per participant_role and identify the legal_entity_or_person and stated_client.
2. Record written_duties, compensation_payer, trigger, referral benefits, and ownership ties from documents.
3. Map permitted_data_recipients and retention terms; assign next_action for each known_limitation.

## Definitions

- **Stated client:** Party the adviser says they represent, to be checked against written duties.
- **Compensation trigger:** Event causing payment, such as closing or a referral.
- **Affiliate tie:** Ownership or related-entity relationship relevant to the engagement.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: REL-01 states Seller as client and a closing-based fee; the buyer requests independent review instead of inferring buyer representation from listing access.

## Review and next action

Resolve representation, incentive, and information-boundary gaps before disclosing more or signing.

A disclosed relationship is a fact to evaluate; it does not prove misconduct, loyalty, independence, or legal duties on its own.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/system/representation)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s broker adviser disclosure. My question is: Who is each adviser’s client, how are they paid, and where can your information go? Explain these terms in plain language: Stated client, Compensation trigger, Affiliate tie. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Engagements; agency disclosures; fee/referral terms; affiliate information; data-use and retention terms. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: A disclosed relationship is a fact to evaluate; it does not prove misconduct, loyalty, independence, or legal duties on its own. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Resolve representation, incentive, and information-boundary gaps before disclosing more or signing.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s broker adviser disclosure against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Create one record per participant_role and identify the legal_entity_or_person and stated_client. Record written_duties, compensation_payer, trigger, referral benefits, and ownership ties from documents. Map permitted_data_recipients and retention terms; assign next_action for each known_limitation. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: A disclosed relationship is a fact to evaluate; it does not prove misconduct, loyalty, independence, or legal duties on its own. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.
