# DenQAI: dental buildout bid scope matrix

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Which construction bids include the same scope, exclusions, and acceptance standard?

**Who:** Owner, architect, contractor reviewers, and project manager

**Records:** Issued drawings/specifications; three written bids; allowances/exclusions; owner-direct budget; closeout criteria.

## Complete the file

1. For each scope_id, identify the issued_requirement_or_drawing.
2. Record each bidder’s status and amount_or_note without treating No response as zero.
3. Enter owner_budget_if_excluded, schedule_effect, acceptance criterion, and question_to_bidders, then review the common scope.

## Definitions

- **Issued requirement:** Controlled drawing or specification all bidders are asked to price.
- **Owner budget if excluded:** Cost provision for required scope omitted from a bid.
- **Acceptance criterion:** Observable condition for accepting completed work or closeout.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: Bid A includes testing while Bid B excludes it; add a supported owner budget and seek clarification before calling B cheaper.

## Review and next action

Resolve the biggest scope exclusion or qualification before comparing apparent totals.

This raw matrix contains mixed notes and amounts and no automatic total; scope and schedule effects require project review.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/startup)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s dental buildout bid scope matrix. My question is: Which construction bids include the same scope, exclusions, and acceptance standard? Explain these terms in plain language: Issued requirement, Owner budget if excluded, Acceptance criterion. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Issued drawings/specifications; three written bids; allowances/exclusions; owner-direct budget; closeout criteria. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: This raw matrix contains mixed notes and amounts and no automatic total; scope and schedule effects require project review. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Resolve the biggest scope exclusion or qualification before comparing apparent totals.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s dental buildout bid scope matrix against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: For each scope_id, identify the issued_requirement_or_drawing. Record each bidder’s status and amount_or_note without treating No response as zero. Enter owner_budget_if_excluded, schedule_effect, acceptance criterion, and question_to_bidders, then review the common scope. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: This raw matrix contains mixed notes and amounts and no automatic total; scope and schedule effects require project review. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.