# DenQAI: dental shell fieldbook

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What can be reused in a dental shell, and what authority, remediation, or reopening cost remains?

**Who:** Buyer/startup owner with architect, technical, environmental, and transaction reviewers

**Records:** Use and lease records; equipment ownership/service history; utility/code findings; liens; records custody; remediation/reopening estimates.

## Complete the file

1. Identify candidate_id and verify use, ownership, assignment, and site/equipment conditions.
2. Keep current reproduction cost, verified reuse value, remediation, obsolete equipment, lease disadvantage, and delay costs separate.
3. Record PHI/records presence only as a condition needing an authorized custody plan; document gaps, owner, and next_action.
4. Define the valuation method before entering risk_adjusted_shell_cost.

## Definitions

- **Verified reuse value:** Supported value of assets or improvements actually usable for the proposed plan.
- **Record custody plan:** Approved responsibility for existing records and authorized access.
- **Risk-adjusted shell cost:** Legacy summary field requiring an explicit method; the CSV itself supplies no formula.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: SHELL-002 has four plumbed rooms but unknown vacuum condition and assignment consent; both remain material gaps rather than assumed savings.

## Review and next action

Resolve the site’s material authority or remediation gap before relying on advertised reuse value.

The raw fieldbook is not an inspection or appraisal. Do not open abandoned patient records or infer asset ownership from physical presence.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/acquisition)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s dental shell fieldbook. My question is: What can be reused in a dental shell, and what authority, remediation, or reopening cost remains? Explain these terms in plain language: Verified reuse value, Record custody plan, Risk-adjusted shell cost. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Use and lease records; equipment ownership/service history; utility/code findings; liens; records custody; remediation/reopening estimates. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The raw fieldbook is not an inspection or appraisal. Do not open abandoned patient records or infer asset ownership from physical presence. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Resolve the site’s material authority or remediation gap before relying on advertised reuse value.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s dental shell fieldbook against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Identify candidate_id and verify use, ownership, assignment, and site/equipment conditions. Keep current reproduction cost, verified reuse value, remediation, obsolete equipment, lease disadvantage, and delay costs separate. Record PHI/records presence only as a condition needing an authorized custody plan; document gaps, owner, and next_action. Define the valuation method before entering risk_adjusted_shell_cost. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The raw fieldbook is not an inspection or appraisal. Do not open abandoned patient records or infer asset ownership from physical presence. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.