# DenQAI: independent scale readiness

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Which nonclinical burden might shared services address without taking away the practice’s decisions?

**Who:** Independent owner and service-design reviewers

**Records:** Observed task failures; frequency or volume; current ownership/vendor arrangements; needed data; proposed quality and exit requirements.

## Complete the file

1. Describe the current_failure_or_burden and observable_owner_or_patient_effect for each capability.
2. Define the needed data, sensitive_data_excluded, and member_decision_retained.
3. Record commercial relationships, required review, measurable service quality, and portability before setting next_action.

## Definitions

- **Capability:** A specific service function such as purchasing or laboratory coordination.
- **Member decision retained:** Choice each practice continues to control.
- **Service-level measure:** Observable standard for the proposed service’s performance.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: Consumable ordering causes two stockouts monthly; the proposed service needs aggregate quantities while product choice stays with the practice.

## Review and next action

Choose one evidenced burden for a bounded feasibility review.

The raw readiness sheet does not establish a service, savings, legal structure, or permission for shared data or coordinated decisions.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/independent/shared-services)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s independent scale readiness. My question is: Which nonclinical burden might shared services address without taking away the practice’s decisions? Explain these terms in plain language: Capability, Member decision retained, Service-level measure. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Observed task failures; frequency or volume; current ownership/vendor arrangements; needed data; proposed quality and exit requirements. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The raw readiness sheet does not establish a service, savings, legal structure, or permission for shared data or coordinated decisions. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Choose one evidenced burden for a bounded feasibility review.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s independent scale readiness against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Describe the current_failure_or_burden and observable_owner_or_patient_effect for each capability. Define the needed data, sensitive_data_excluded, and member_decision_retained. Record commercial relationships, required review, measurable service quality, and portability before setting next_action. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The raw readiness sheet does not establish a service, savings, legal structure, or permission for shared data or coordinated decisions. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.