# DenQAI: owner case consent preview

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What must a future approved consent process explain to a prospective participant?

**Who:** Research lead, independent ethics reviewer, and privacy counsel

**Records:** Approved study design; responsible roles; procedures; risks; data map; compensation; withdrawal and publication rules.

## Complete the file

1. Use Required opening and What participation would involve to identify facts that must be settled.
2. Review foreseeable risks, data/privacy, compensation/conflicts, and withdrawal/correction with the actual protocol.
3. Confirm the No waiver principle and Approval gate; replace the preview only through the required review process.

## Definitions

- **Voluntary participation:** Ability to decline without the described penalties or loss of access.
- **Withdrawal cutoff:** Point after which specified data removal may no longer be practical.
- **Re-identification risk:** Possibility that a person can be recognized from combined details despite removed names.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: The proposed study has not determined compensation or a withdrawal cutoff; both remain unresolved design items and no one is asked to consent.

## Review and next action

Prepare an actual reviewed consent process after the study and its accountable roles are established.

This Markdown preview is explicitly not an approved consent form and cannot be used for enrollment.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/research/case-series)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s owner case consent preview. My question is: What must a future approved consent process explain to a prospective participant? Explain these terms in plain language: Voluntary participation, Withdrawal cutoff, Re-identification risk. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Approved study design; responsible roles; procedures; risks; data map; compensation; withdrawal and publication rules. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: This Markdown preview is explicitly not an approved consent form and cannot be used for enrollment. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Prepare an actual reviewed consent process after the study and its accountable roles are established.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s owner case consent preview against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Use Required opening and What participation would involve to identify facts that must be settled. Review foreseeable risks, data/privacy, compensation/conflicts, and withdrawal/correction with the actual protocol. Confirm the No waiver principle and Approval gate; replace the preview only through the required review process. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: This Markdown preview is explicitly not an approved consent form and cannot be used for enrollment. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.