# DenQAI: owner case pilot protocol

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What must be established before the proposed owner case-series pilot can enroll anyone?

**Who:** Research lead and qualified independent research/privacy reviewers

**Records:** Protocol; eligibility and analysis plan; independent determination; consent design; data/security and publication controls.

## Complete the file

1. Read Proposed pilot boundary, Explicit exclusions, and Regulatory determination gate together.
2. Trace each research question through independent evidence axes and the Analysis plan.
3. Assess Privacy and release design, Participant control, and every Launch gate; keep missing implementation evidence open.

## Definitions

- **Case series:** Structured study of a bounded set of cases without an automatic population claim.
- **Independent evidence axes:** Separate source kind, support, verification, time, review, and limitation fields.
- **Negative case:** A case that challenges the preferred explanation.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: A coded owner account suggests a loan covenant changed a decision; reviewers seek contemporaneous records and contrary explanations rather than treating the account as causation.

## Review and next action

Obtain the required independent determination and documented controls before any recruitment or enrollment.

This is a proposed pilot protocol. The current builder does not enroll, receive submissions, approve consent, or establish research compliance.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/research/case-series)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s owner case pilot protocol. My question is: What must be established before the proposed owner case-series pilot can enroll anyone? Explain these terms in plain language: Case series, Independent evidence axes, Negative case. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Protocol; eligibility and analysis plan; independent determination; consent design; data/security and publication controls. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: This is a proposed pilot protocol. The current builder does not enroll, receive submissions, approve consent, or establish research compliance. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Obtain the required independent determination and documented controls before any recruitment or enrollment.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s owner case pilot protocol against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Read Proposed pilot boundary, Explicit exclusions, and Regulatory determination gate together. Trace each research question through independent evidence axes and the Analysis plan. Assess Privacy and release design, Participant control, and every Launch gate; keep missing implementation evidence open. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: This is a proposed pilot protocol. The current builder does not enroll, receive submissions, approve consent, or establish research compliance. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.