# DenQAI: ownership path comparison inputs

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Can six ownership paths be compared using consistent money, time, control, and exit assumptions?

**Who:** Owner and independent financial/transaction reviewer

**Records:** Compensation and benefits; clinical and management hours; capital; debt terms; household reserve; exit assumptions; decision rights.

## Complete the file

1. Keep one path_id per alternative and replace every fictional row.
2. Enter compensation, ownership cash, benefits, hours, capital, and debt in their stated units.
3. Record terminal assumptions separately and support each yes/no safety field with evidence.
4. Review break_condition and example_status before using the ownership comparison.

## Definitions

- **Unpaid management hours:** Annual owner time for management outside the stated clinical hours.
- **Household reserve protected:** Cash the scenario leaves available for the household’s stated reserve purpose.
- **Terminal realizable percent:** Assumed share of entered year-10 gross value that can be realized; it requires explicit support.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: The employment example has $225,000 clinical compensation and 25 unpaid management hours; replace both and compare with the startup’s distinct debt and capital requirements.

## Review and next action

Investigate the assumption that changes the preferred path and compare a downside case.

Raw inputs contain no calculations. Fictional growth, exit, and guarantee assumptions are not predictions; preserve the current model’s definitions.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/ownership/compare)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s ownership path comparison inputs. My question is: Can six ownership paths be compared using consistent money, time, control, and exit assumptions? Explain these terms in plain language: Unpaid management hours, Household reserve protected, Terminal realizable percent. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Compensation and benefits; clinical and management hours; capital; debt terms; household reserve; exit assumptions; decision rights. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: Raw inputs contain no calculations. Fictional growth, exit, and guarantee assumptions are not predictions; preserve the current model’s definitions. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Investigate the assumption that changes the preferred path and compare a downside case.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s ownership path comparison inputs against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Keep one path_id per alternative and replace every fictional row. Enter compensation, ownership cash, benefits, hours, capital, and debt in their stated units. Record terminal assumptions separately and support each yes/no safety field with evidence. Review break_condition and example_status before using the ownership comparison. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: Raw inputs contain no calculations. Fictional growth, exit, and guarantee assumptions are not predictions; preserve the current model’s definitions. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.