# DenQAI: patient centered capacity mandate

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Which conditions must growth preserve for patients, staff, and clinical judgment?

**Who:** Owner dentist, operations lead, and clinical reviewer

**Records:** Care standards; access policies; sustainable schedules; referral and quality evidence; staffing/support constraints.

## Complete the file

1. Review each control and make owner_rule specific to the practice.
2. Identify a measurable failure_signal and the controlling_record that would reveal it.
3. Assign reviewer_role and next_action, keeping status open until the rule is supported.

## Definitions

- **Capacity mandate:** Rules growth and scheduling decisions must preserve.
- **Failure signal:** Observable sign that the stated rule is being violated.
- **Clinical independence:** Preserved diagnosis, consent, treatment, referral, and appointment judgment.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: CAP-M02 treats an appropriate appointment or documented redirection as the access goal; a high booking rate alone does not satisfy it.

## Review and next action

Use the mandate to bound any marketing, scheduling, or hiring scenario.

The worksheet sets conditions; it does not calculate sustainable capacity or authorize changes in treatment or staffing duties.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/growth)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s patient centered capacity mandate. My question is: Which conditions must growth preserve for patients, staff, and clinical judgment? Explain these terms in plain language: Capacity mandate, Failure signal, Clinical independence. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Care standards; access policies; sustainable schedules; referral and quality evidence; staffing/support constraints. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The worksheet sets conditions; it does not calculate sustainable capacity or authorize changes in treatment or staffing duties. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Use the mandate to bound any marketing, scheduling, or hiring scenario.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s patient centered capacity mandate against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Review each control and make owner_rule specific to the practice. Identify a measurable failure_signal and the controlling_record that would reveal it. Assign reviewer_role and next_action, keeping status open until the rule is supported. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The worksheet sets conditions; it does not calculate sustainable capacity or authorize changes in treatment or staffing duties. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.