# DenQAI: patient centered owner mandate

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What clinical, household, time, and authority rules must every ownership path satisfy?

**Who:** Owner dentist, household decision partners, and independent advisers

**Records:** Written care priorities; household reserve and time constraints; proposed decision rights; evidence for each path.

## Complete the file

1. Answer each decision_question without anchoring to a preferred path.
2. State a concrete hard_stop and controlling_record for each answer.
3. Assign reviewer_role and recheck_period so changed facts prompt a deliberate update.

## Definitions

- **Owner mandate:** Written conditions an ownership path must support.
- **Hard stop:** A condition that prevents proceeding until resolved.
- **Recheck period:** The chosen time or event for reviewing a condition again.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: MANDATE-01 requires appointment lengths consistent with the dentist’s care model; a path that permits unilateral shortening fails the stated condition.

## Review and next action

Carry the same mandate into the ownership-path comparison and reject unsupported safety assumptions.

The worksheet captures owner priorities, not a recommendation that ownership, employment, or any buyer category is inherently better.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/ownership)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s patient centered owner mandate. My question is: What clinical, household, time, and authority rules must every ownership path satisfy? Explain these terms in plain language: Owner mandate, Hard stop, Recheck period. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Written care priorities; household reserve and time constraints; proposed decision rights; evidence for each path. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: The worksheet captures owner priorities, not a recommendation that ownership, employment, or any buyer category is inherently better. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Carry the same mandate into the ownership-path comparison and reject unsupported safety assumptions.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s patient centered owner mandate against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Answer each decision_question without anchoring to a preferred path. State a concrete hard_stop and controlling_record for each answer. Assign reviewer_role and recheck_period so changed facts prompt a deliberate update. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: The worksheet captures owner priorities, not a recommendation that ownership, employment, or any buyer category is inherently better. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.
