# DenQAI: patient centered seller mandate

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What must a sale preserve for the seller, patients, and staff?

**Who:** Selling dentist and independent financial/transaction reviewers

**Records:** Owner priorities; household financial plan; debt/cost estimates; care-continuity objectives; proposed agreements.

## Complete the file

1. Answer each decision_area as a specific seller_rule before evaluating offers.
2. Link the rule to controlling_evidence and the appropriate reviewer_role.
3. Write an observable break_condition and revisit status as offers or circumstances change.

## Definitions

- **Seller rule:** The seller’s stated condition for an acceptable path.
- **Controlling evidence:** The record used to support or test that condition.
- **Break condition:** An observable fact that would cause the path to be reconsidered.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: SM-02 sets a maximum transition workload of two clinical days a week; employment terms requiring four days trigger review.

## Review and next action

Translate the reviewed mandate into offer comparison and transaction instructions.

A mandate records priorities; it does not make them binding unless the relevant agreements and practical controls support them.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/succession)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s patient centered seller mandate. My question is: What must a sale preserve for the seller, patients, and staff? Explain these terms in plain language: Seller rule, Controlling evidence, Break condition. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Owner priorities; household financial plan; debt/cost estimates; care-continuity objectives; proposed agreements. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: A mandate records priorities; it does not make them binding unless the relevant agreements and practical controls support them. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Translate the reviewed mandate into offer comparison and transaction instructions.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s patient centered seller mandate against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Answer each decision_area as a specific seller_rule before evaluating offers. Link the rule to controlling_evidence and the appropriate reviewer_role. Write an observable break_condition and revisit status as offers or circumstances change. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: A mandate records priorities; it does not make them binding unless the relevant agreements and practical controls support them. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.