# DenQAI: patient centered startup mandate

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

What care model and operating limits should the startup site and budget support?

**Who:** Startup owner, clinical mentor, and project reviewers

**Records:** Written care mandate; opening service scope; demand assumptions; room/staff program; reserve and timing constraints.

## Complete the file

1. Answer each owner_question before committing to a site or equipment package.
2. Link owner_answer to the required_record and reviewer_role.
3. Set an observable break_condition and maintain status as design or costs change.

## Definitions

- **Opening scope:** Services and technologies intended to be supported at opening.
- **Required record:** Evidence needed to support the owner’s stated requirement.
- **Break condition:** A fact that would require redesign, delay, or reconsideration.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: The owner excludes a planned advanced imaging service from the opening scope, so its projected collections do not justify initial debt.

## Review and next action

Translate the reviewed mandate into the site investigation, issued scope, and capital budget.

A mandate is a planning input, not proof of local demand, permit approval, or technical suitability.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/startup)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s patient centered startup mandate. My question is: What care model and operating limits should the startup site and budget support? Explain these terms in plain language: Opening scope, Required record, Break condition. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Written care mandate; opening service scope; demand assumptions; room/staff program; reserve and timing constraints. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: A mandate is a planning input, not proof of local demand, permit approval, or technical suitability. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Translate the reviewed mandate into the site investigation, issued scope, and capital budget.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s patient centered startup mandate against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Answer each owner_question before committing to a site or equipment package. Link owner_answer to the required_record and reviewer_role. Set an observable break_condition and maintain status as design or costs change. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: A mandate is a planning input, not proof of local demand, permit approval, or technical suitability. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.