# DenQAI: practice flow review workbook

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

Which people, rooms, appointment work, and service-access assumptions can support a capacity review?

**Who:** Owner and practice operations team

**Records:** Aggregate staffing hours, rooms, equipment availability, appointment task minutes, access observations, and coverage assumptions.

## Complete the file

1. Read Start Here and use the Fictional Example to distinguish resource hours from appointment work.
2. Complete blank Your Inputs for core resources and one appointment/service record; repeat those records as needed for the web planner’s full case.
3. Use Review and Actions to resolve missing capacity evidence and enter supported records into Practice Flow; check each required resource before considering demand.

## Definitions

- **Resource load:** Required work divided by available time or capacity for the same period.
- **Service opening upper bound:** Unfilled service hours before allocation against shared resources and overlaps.
- **Appointment template:** An explicit record of room and role minutes required for a type of visit.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: restorative access shows openings while doctor work exceeds available minutes; address the doctor constraint before considering a demand test.

## Review and next action

Run the supported case in Practice Flow and inspect resource constraints; remaining service openings are upper bounds, not approved appointment slots.

This is a manual preparation pack with no formulas. It does not calculate results, import automatically into the linked tool, or replace source and professional review.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/operations/practice-flow)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s practice flow review workbook. My question is: Which people, rooms, appointment work, and service-access assumptions can support a capacity review? Explain these terms in plain language: Resource load, Service opening upper bound, Appointment template. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Aggregate staffing hours, rooms, equipment availability, appointment task minutes, access observations, and coverage assumptions. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: This is a manual preparation pack with no formulas. It does not calculate results, import automatically into the linked tool, or replace source and professional review. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Run the supported case in Practice Flow and inspect resource constraints; remaining service openings are upper bounds, not approved appointment slots.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s practice flow review workbook against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Read Start Here and use the Fictional Example to distinguish resource hours from appointment work. Complete blank Your Inputs for core resources and one appointment/service record; repeat those records as needed for the web planner’s full case. Use Review and Actions to resolve missing capacity evidence and enter supported records into Practice Flow; check each required resource before considering demand. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: This is a manual preparation pack with no formulas. It does not calculate results, import automatically into the linked tool, or replace source and professional review. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.