# DenQAI: seller private buyer instructions

File-specific companion · 2026-09-10

## Purpose

How can the seller specify a fair process and measurable patient-continuity priorities?

**Who:** Selling owner and independent transaction counsel

**Records:** Seller mandate; draft broker engagement; marketing rules; offer log; handoff, records, and data arrangements.

## Complete the file

1. Define the assignment and eligible buyer process before approving marketing.
2. Specify qualification and offer-presentation rules that compare cash, contingent terms, and closing conditions consistently.
3. Convert stewardship and data priorities into observable responsibilities with counsel, preserving the document’s stated limits.

## Definitions

- **Offer-presentation log:** Record of offers received, presented, terms, and disposition.
- **Staged disclosure:** Releasing defined information only when the recipient meets the next authorized stage.
- **Stewardship term:** Specific responsibility intended to preserve patient and staff continuity.

## Fictional example

Fictional example: A seller requests a defined private-buyer marketing period and records every qualified offer’s cash, transition duties, and reason for disposition.

## Review and next action

Incorporate reviewed instructions into the actual engagement and monitor the offer log.

This educational draft is not an engagement agreement. Buyer category alone does not establish patient-centered quality.

[Related DenQAI guide](https://denqai.com/succession)

## AI coach prompt

Help me use DenQAI’s seller private buyer instructions. My question is: How can the seller specify a fair process and measurable patient-continuity priorities? Explain these terms in plain language: Offer-presentation log, Staged disclosure, Stewardship term. Ask one question at a time about the required records: Seller mandate; draft broker engagement; marketing rules; offer log; handoff, records, and data arrangements. Walk through the supplied fictional example before asking me for inputs. Treat every missing value as unknown, not zero. Do not invent source records, contract terms, legal conclusions, or clinical facts. Use only permitted fictional or aggregate, non-identifying information. Follow this boundary: This educational draft is not an engagement agreement. Buyer category alone does not establish patient-centered quality. End with the missing evidence and this next step: Incorporate reviewed instructions into the actual engagement and monitor the offer log.

## AI review prompt

Review my permitted fictional or aggregate draft of DenQAI’s seller private buyer instructions against the file instructions. Check each required field and period, units, evidence locator, assumptions, arithmetic where formulas are actually supplied, and unresolved contradictions. Check the sequence: Define the assignment and eligible buyer process before approving marketing. Specify qualification and offer-presentation rules that compare cash, contingent terms, and closing conditions consistently. Convert stewardship and data priorities into observable responsibilities with counsel, preserving the document’s stated limits. Separate facts from assumptions and missing records. Do not supply unsupported numbers or make a professional decision for me. Apply this limitation: This educational draft is not an engagement agreement. Buyer category alone does not establish patient-centered quality. Return corrections, questions for the responsible reviewer, and the next action.